For Now I'm #58
Back in the Yard, Barkers! Sorry for the delay - I have been running ragged since the draft. The days just keep flying by. It has been the quickest two weeks I have ever experienced. After sharing that great day with you I jumped on a plane to Cincinnati to meet the Bengals staff and the media. I flew home to LA the next day (Monday) and had to catch up on some class and repack. We had rookie mini camp that week so I had to get ready to head back to Cincinnati Thursday. Then it was mini camp, meeting the coaches, the rest of the draft class and the other guys. I flew back to LA Sunday and started getting ready for finals - my first one is today in Micro Economics. We'll see how that goes. It was cool meeting the rest of the draft class and to see the coaching style I will be experiencing from here on out. It was a rookie camp so there weren't many of the veterans around. I did meet Odell Thurman and Ahmad Brooks - they were really good guys and I'm glad I got to spend some time with them. I did talk to Odell about getting #55, but he's pretty attached to it and I understand why. The number suits him playing the SAM. He was really nice about it and I appreciated him talking to me about it. For now I am wearing #58 and have to decide if that's what I'll stay in. Mini camp was a different experience. I feel like I started to pick up the defense and was able to compete by the end. I was talking to LJ (Lawrence Jackson) and he took the words right out of my mouth - it is a different grind. The body was definitely beat down but there are more mental gymnastics in the NFL. It's much more of a work grind than the college game. It took me a little bit to get the feel for it but by the last day I felt like I could go out and play my game.


BrockSamson said May 09, 2008
Economics of Football:
http://assets.cambridge.org/97805216/61584/sample/9780521661584ws.pdf
http://www.economicshelp.org/2007/09/economics-of-football.html
This reminded me of a joke I found when I was studying for my own economics final:
Worried that your positive linear transformation followed by a translation will ruin the ordering of your von Neumann-Morganstern utility function? You don't have to - that is a fine transformation!
I think I failed that test actually so you might just want to ignore this comment on the whole.
Dewey said May 09, 2008
ClaytonHOF22__ said May 09, 2008
Dewey replied May 09, 2008
JWLinder said May 09, 2008
tcbailey24 said May 09, 2008
Jeffd84 said May 09, 2008
Don't forget to thank Derrick, the "Bird" from Junior Varsity at Lake Mary. The best time I have ever had, even with the losing record. I remember when you were a running back. Times have changed. Congratulations on your first round pick and I will keep my eye out for you....Jeff Depto
corlando234 said May 10, 2008
nastynati replied May 12, 2008
Jesus316 said May 11, 2008
tribe2408 said May 12, 2008
Who Dey!
rezod21 said May 12, 2008
buckeyechris said May 12, 2008
bburton359 said May 21, 2008
tone_a1 said May 25, 2008